don't see how a statement of a non holder of TLM can say that non holders increase the share price if that particular non holder is trying to say that TLM is overinflated ? also can't see how that a non holder can't see how a "very likely announced" double increase in iron ore royalty gifted to TLM with no cash outlay can likely be a catalyst to decrease the share price ? best to state 'how' you believe the SP can drop with current exploration news imminent & cash flow news increase or if not, best not to make such statements. All the "holders" see from a non holder of such negative comments without a "logical" justified response screams that someone is trying to run the SP down to get onboard ? A logical statement would that may be accepted by all is something like " with current covid new strain news in the media, SP likely to drop". I listen to the announcements and look at the cash flow and the associated MC, that is how I make my decisions and I can't seem to be able to justify yours of an SP drop likely? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion agreed...but lets get some credible reasoning please....
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TLM
- Ann: Appendices 3Y x3, option expiry
Ann: Appendices 3Y x3, option expiry, page-31
Featured News
Add TLM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
26.0¢ |
Change
0.020(8.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $48.96M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
25.0¢ | 26.0¢ | 24.0¢ | $30.35K | 121.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | 23.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
26.0¢ | 65499 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 49635 | 0.225 |
2 | 47500 | 0.215 |
2 | 85321 | 0.205 |
3 | 130000 | 0.200 |
1 | 5000 | 0.195 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.260 | 65499 | 1 |
0.275 | 1900 | 1 |
0.280 | 2000 | 1 |
0.285 | 60000 | 1 |
0.300 | 7569 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
TLM (ASX) Chart |