misinformation

I am a non stock holder due to the stocks technical position atm, but I'm still entitled to my opinion on this stock. If I was reading a thread on a stock, I would personally like to know all the positives and negatives about the stock to make an informed decision, on whether to buy hold or sell on a fundamental basis. If it wasn,t for these so called downrampers which try to post their view on this thread I myself would not be as well informed about this stock as I believe I am today. I know they post some rubbish but so do some of the stock holders on this thread.Debate the issues don't blast them. For example please explain to me how the article which a poster posted on the thread ""proactive investors australia - prr report...."" is credable when the article states ""The wraps are high from Springtree on the prospects for Prima BioMed's CVac™, based on its due diligence"" when springtree to date has received over 20 million shares at less than 8 cents/share and they do not appear as a Top 20 shareholder? Yes I was a shareholder and yes I ramped the stock with relevant articles posted at the time when my analysis indicated it was undervalued. I also gave the downrampers a hard time but I did my research and gave them valid responses as others have. I currently do not hold PRR atm re the technical aspect of the stock and keeping in mind my fundamental concerns as well but I do hope they are able to have a good shot at commercialising Cvac in the future. Try and keep this thread as realistic as possible, it will only benefit you and fellow investors in your investment decision, the stock will find its true value in time based on valid fundamentals.Goodluck.