General discussion, page-385

Thanks for the reply.

Yeah but those figures are before costs and tax. I have looked through the DFS multiple times. I even just re-read the whole thing.

Carried away? The figures are massively off. I understand with higher purity comes higher profit but we are looking at approx. 150mil over 10 years ATM give or take? No where in the study it says anything to the contrary. That is like a 700-800% difference. Anything else said is just a guess.

No way it is anything close to 100mil profit p/a. The stock price would be a lot higher and not coming back down to test a 20-30 mil MC like it is now.