Argument that ISX directors’ motive for earning the shares in 2018 were in the shareholder’s best interest., page-167

You talk about facts while saying that "walls have already closed around ownership matters" and calling OM's report a "fairy tale". Ignoring this from ASIC:

Translation: ASIC are taking no action against OM because they were right.

So which walls are closing in, and what fairy tale are you talking about? The one that was correct and is now subject of a federal court proceeding? I also have no idea what "due process" you think OM didn't offer ISX. I really struggle with this argument. I don't have a lot of respect for shorting houses, but at the end of the day, they did exactly what they say they're going to do, and they probably made a lot of money from it.