EPC 1045. BWN buy it for $2.7m, spend a couple of million on it and then Minnelex value it at $1.09m (100%) despite valuing it at $5.1m in the 2008 IER using the Prospectivity Enhancement Multiplier approach?
Please explain how the $ per sub-block method should take precedence over the PEM method.
Also please explain why you would use such a low PEM as per your previous post where you stated 1.25 would be appropriate. In the 2008 IER a PEM of 3.0 was used for EPC 1045. All other EPCs had PEMs of 2.5 or 3 with the exception of Tarong and Cape River which had 1.5 (whereas I would have used 1.0).
I look forward to your response.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
51.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $140.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 51.0¢ | 52.0¢ | 50.0¢ | $1.471M | 2.923M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16564 | 50.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 52.0¢ | 8981 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 15/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BWN (ASX) Chart |