Most CO2 Increase not Man Made, page-113

These "believers" of a theory don't have any data on

A) the amount of space dust impacting earth for the last 150 years
B) The velocity of space dust impacting earth for the last 150 years
C) The amount of asteroids that have impacted earth for the last 150 years

They don't even have data on that for the last year, let alone 150 years. They don't have any data on the full electromagnetic output of the sun in the last year, let alone 150 years. Though like I said they are definitely monitoring more right now than ever before which is welcome.

These are facts no one can deny. Yet they want you to think they have "all the data" to prove that CO2 alone is the cause of warming. When you have incomplete data sets of energy input to the Earth how can you think any model is correct? The simplistic algorithms used to model the Earth in these climate models is ridiculously basic, it has to be because of the number of variables.

Either way if we assume their model of Earth is correct, which it isn't, they aren't even including all energy inputs to Earth in them. And there is simply no way to know the last 150 years of data on many of these inputs either. It is complete guess work. The amount of wiggle room that guess work has can make the Earth into Venus or Pluto. All the variables in every model are tuned and guessed to get what they want. Simple as that.