Let me try that again...
Change:
The alternate interpretation of 100m meaning 100 metres of test strip is MUCH too large - it would represent about 1 BILLION test strips at 10cm or 2 BILLION strips if they are 5cm. Not very likely.
To:
The alternate interpretation of 100m meaning 100 metres of test strip is too small - it would represent about 1000 test strips at 10cm or 2000 strips if they are 5cm. So 40 - 80 kits of 25 which would hardly touch the sides of even an embryonic distribution channel.
Sorry for the double multiplication by 1000
GLTAH.
Ann: Quarterly Update / Appendix 4C, page-135
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 107 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
