OK, call me paranoid, but if the article is misleading and there are bots that scan for negative sentiment for the purpose of lowering SP enough to trigger hitting stop losses, wouldn't that clearly define manipulation? Wouldn't then the article with false or exaggerated negatives be the catalyst for the manipulation?
BrainChip - Continuing concerns about continuous disclosure, page-122
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 835 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
21.0¢ |
Change
0.020(10.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $391.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.5¢ | 21.5¢ | 18.5¢ | $2.072M | 10.31M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 765206 | 21.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.5¢ | 819855 | 32 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.32am 22/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRN (ASX) Chart |