Ann: Quarterly Activities Report, page-34

No deception at all. You are the deceptive poster telling the market skaland has a positive npv?

Let’s keep a mine operating that is losing money. If skaland was owned by any other mining company it would have put it on care and maintenance until a profitable, deliverable, funded model was viable. This is common with mining companies to do this, maybe do some research, but we all know now your research skills are poor.

it has been 2 years of loses, with no pfs completed, don’t even know if the pfs can be completed due to no update from company if it is funded and I have a feeling positive management have no funds left to complete the pfs.

buy hey let’s lie to the other shareholders and make skaland have a positive npv when in fact it has zip.