Not kidding myself at all. I just don't look at EPM uranium through the basic view of needing to be a future producer. In fact I am stead fast against EPM trying to develop a U mine and only support them punching a few holes in the dirt.
You see, If I want to be invested in potential u producers this cycle I would not pick EPM... I would invest in others, and I have. I'm In EPM because during the last cycle companies who wanted to be associated to Uranium exploded in number, into the hundreds lol. Well, they are all gone and only the strong survived
So, I'm in EPM as they are Uranium land Barron's with 9,000 km2 of prime uranium land, ready to sell parcels to desperate companies wanting a piece of the future UBull. I hear GGG is looking for a new project and getting back into URA would be a god send right about now...
Some of these U prospecting companies are ducking around with less than 10,000 acres, whilst EPM hold 2,223,948 acres, including land on the Ranger Fault.
Alas, my thesis on EPM is one where they never break ground for a U mine
And hey, I agree, I could be just a crazy nutter going down in flames.
(20min delay)