Neils role was clear - an intermediary between the company and its shareholders, alongside assisting with social media comms. And it's now been quite a while since it was terminated.
I would bet an amount equal to the combined losses of all holders that Neil pushed the company for more change (to benefit holders) than you ever did. Yet you blame him for the actions of the company when it was clear he wasn't the one with the decision making power. Not only this, but he was a shareholder too so sharing in the same downside (moreso based on holding volume) than you.
Grow up, own your losses & move on.
Or have a rant direct to the company. To play the blame game on this website IS childish.