Ann: Results of Meeting, page-10

Yes I do. It is a sensible outcome.

Especially based on the quality of debate on this forum. The NO NO NO case was championed by unsubstantiated fear mongering claiming white collar crime, corporate raiding, African investment in DRC, etc and even today the accusation of asset stripping and fraud. None of this, to me, has any sense.

Reminds me that almost half the United States population voted for Trump and many swallowed similar wild accusatory claims to motivate their vote.

Sensible is the right word to describe todays outcome.

I would be interested in you substantiating your claim that the meeting outcome is unfair. Unfair on whom? And exactly how?

I suspect the joke is on you.