aztec, you said "when do we get over bagging the people we all elected and get on with thrashing out the facts"
Lets have a sneaky peak at a few of YOUR latest efforts.
1)need to keep it simple for the septics
2)or perhaps it could just be the truth, you're starting to sound a little paranoid- out of interest who do you think was responsible for 9/11? got a wacky conspiracy theory for that too?
3)well imagine that! try to fight ridiculous sceptic one-liners point by point with logic! find yourself on the back foot? my apologies
'No Debate.. just destroy all opposing thought! No interest in debate! No concience! No ethics!'
4)sounds like the septics on hotcopper!
5)jeez showing your age- still got a nervous twitch from the cold war era? where are those pesky ruskies?
6)why dont you add climate skepticism or your list of 'isms'?
7)in my experience people with confidence and convinction get things done- they are need to swathe through all the detractors and naysayers- otherwise nothing gets done.
those that don't, end up making snivelling bratty comments on hotcopper
8)i am sure if the was an international summit on climate skepticism you'd all be scrambling in your hummers and private jets to get there
9)take a bex and have a good lie down
10)ok einstein- lets get rid of the all the politicians
11)this is what I mean- you all harp on about politicians being the root of all evil- what would you prefer? dictatorships? communism?
Lets take another look at the first sentence I highlighted "when do we get over bagging the people we all elected and get on with thrashing out the facts"
Your argument is always based around personal attacks (bagging) of posters who don't share your view. If you would like to gain more credibility, perhaps stop the antagonistic, patronising, condescending posts and just stick to the debate yourself. Just because people have differing views to yours, makes them by no means stupid, maybe try and remember that.
