I might be showing my ignorance, but hasn't clastic zone 31 been excluded from the visuals on page 2?
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02482423-6A1075431?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4
And Long Canyon 2 had the 240ppm Li strike in 2019 in clastic zone 31, which would mean it has an assumed 3km radius?
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02176503-6A956201?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4
I guess I'm missing something obvious, but it seems if clastic zone 31 were introduced into the visuals surrounding Long Canyon 2 in a 3km radius, then 20% of the SITLA claim on the far right is caught in that radius, alongside the entirety of the small SITLA claim near the "Utah State" text in the document? (page 2 again)
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02482423-6A1075431?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4
Regardless they'll still need to enter Long Canyon 2 for the Mississippian exploration.
ASN General Discussion, page-62
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20,989 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ASN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
9.5¢ |
Change
-0.002(2.06%) |
Mkt cap ! $122.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 9.7¢ | 9.8¢ | 9.4¢ | $250.8K | 2.629M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 206667 | 9.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5¢ | 298330 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ASN (ASX) Chart |