New Presentation, page-34

It was the lack of damage control that killed the shareprice. It was negative statements after negative statements, with careless language, and no foresight of how damaging it was to shareholder's confidence.

Investorstream should also be fired for lack of consideration about the questions asked; basically asking DT to repeat his negative answers multiple times, and not understanding the company enough to change the subject to a more positive topic when needed. What about the patents? What about the 70% silicone? What about the 90-100% gains in retention?

I'm not saying give us more lies and positive spins, but I don't believe for one second that there is zero positive progress on all/any fronts. IMO, if DT knew his job was depending on how well he presented, he might have prepared himself a lot more and really picked out some positive progress to talk about. But that's why we're calling for a change, we need proactive management, not reactive.