Given, as you suggest, that the data is shown to be raw unadjusted records of temperature over the period, then that is the best post I have seen on this whole AGW debate.
We've all been aware of past ice ages and warmer and cooler periods but I've never seen it displayed in such a way. It makes it very hard to argue that the slight up-tick at the end of the clear down-trend over the last 4000-odd years, is clear evidence of man-made GW and it will be the ruin of us all.
