If you check back to my posts about 15/16th you will see I have used the population stats and even with the boostered vs everyone else the unvaccinated and 2 jabbers were only 2x the risk on paper.
And using the 16+ population is very handy for the narrative. The 5-15's are also eligible but fewer of them are jabbed (so let's not use them eh).
Using the death numbers you replied to on Troyus's post, let's see what the population numbers you guys insist on using, tell us for that particular week (pop. numbers approximate). Also, note my death numbers (from the NSW govt.) are different to the 'official' chart in Troyus's post, my 5 to their 8 - another question mark.
Deaths 39
Unvac 5
All jabs 34
5 / 1,170,000 = 0.000004
34 / 6,410,000 = 0.000005
For that week to the 12th March the unvaccinated died at a slightly lesser rate than the 2 and 3 jabbers, despite the latter having 5.4x the population. You can perhaps see why they now include the 2 jabbers with the unvaccinated, because it skews the numbers back in their favor.
Plus, they don't mention the obvious - that over 30% of deaths and hospitalisations are boosted.
Soon, they'll have to think of something else.
- Forums
- Breaking News
- COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED
COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED, page-36017
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 66,417 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LGP
LITTLE GREEN PHARMA LTD
Paul Long, Chief Executive Officer
Paul Long
Chief Executive Officer
SPONSORED BY The Market Online