vote no for gunns, page-14

Please be specific and enlighten me Marri on my poor grasp and what you call rants on Gunns proposal


,I am more than happy for you to show me where I will and others benefit from this,remember there are alot of my posts that are not what you claim ,in fact they are sourced from others that have reported in the media,and from other postings on HC on other stocks,

If you beleive this is ranting ask the forum director to suspend me,because that is the only way you can get me to not post and as I keep saying,i reckon we are the losers ,DYOR and then go all the way back to the beginning of this sorry saga.

Even the people who were of the persuasion that PPPL was the way to go are dirty that Gunns got the blessing of the CBA and ANZ and that is not my opinion that was in the media,

Are you in a liqiudated GTP scheme?
Are you a shareholder with any realtion to the various players in this regurgitated Project Transformation 2?
Are you aware of the first Project Transformation?
Have you done a financial evaluation of what each investor will get,all things being equal?
Are you aware that the banks liquidated the schemes and annoited Gunns in Some ,but not all the schemes ?
In fact the banks hold the tree schemes that the liquidated GTP had salted away in each of the schemes,this is a guess but reckon it is in the 30%,LOL
Then the banks wanting to lower the voting ratio ,re the court - SC Davies decision


Is it or is not to the club banks best interest to liquidate and why such a hurry?--You don't have to refer back to far to understand why on this forum.

We haven't even started to scratch the surface of this whole Ponzi scheme,refer to the Hansard in the senate inquiry that is still going,and while it is still going the banks want to liquidate

Anyway you want to spin it go for it,deal with the facts and not genralising

ANd once again I am or have voted a A quadrella of NO<
As Peter Cundall of ABC fame would say,that's your bloomin lot