It looks like to me the first two holes they have announced were drilled through the meat of the resource whereas the next two holes to be released is where the real test and potential 'breakout' lies.
It concerns me however that they drilled #4 and then stepped forward to drill #5 with a cost-saving RC collar and DD tail? does anyone else have thoughts on this?
perhaps they hit nothing in #4 and stepped forward looking for an extension in #5 then decided to go back for #6 and #7 back in the meat for some guaranteed grades just incase #4 & #5 are dusters?
Ann: Drilling at Twin Hills Hits Impressive 162 m @ 2.65 g/t Au, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GBZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.096M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1577945 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8¢ | 1525586 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GBZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable