from my understanding, the reason why lithium is far more suited is because lithium can produce a higher energy density then vanadium. Meaning it can exert a much greater amount of energy for acceleration of a car then what vanadium redox flow batteries can do. However, the low density that is seen in VRFB is far more suited for utility use.
Ann: Bankable Feasibility Study for Australian Vanadium Project, page-264
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 118 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AVL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $120.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 93 | 1.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4¢ | 209375 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 09.56am 09/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AVL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable