Russia Ukraine war, page-26652

I haven't claimed that the Roman Catholic church existed at the time of Christ - how could it. Anyway, I have got the charge of 'Jewish deicide' and the 'Blood Libel' mixed up; more on both below -

Jewish deicide is the belief that the Jews as a people will always be collectively responsible for the killing of Jesus, even through the successive generations following his death.^[1][2] A Biblical justification for the charge of Jewish deicide is derived from Matthew 27:24–25.
It arose in early Christianity, the charge was made by Justin Martyr and Melito of Sardis as early as the 2nd century.^[3] The accusation that the Jews were Christ-killers fed Christian antisemitism^[4] and spurred on acts of violence against Jews such as pogroms, massacres of Jews during the Crusades, expulsions of the Jews from England, France, Spain, Portugal and other places, and torture during the Spanish and Portuguese Inquisitions.

Blood libel or ritual murder libel (also blood accusation)^[1][2] is an antisemitic canard^[3][4][5] which falsely accuses Jews of murdering Christian boys (or other gentiles) in order to use their blood in the performance of religious rituals.^[1][2][6] Historically, echoing very old myths of secret cultic practices in many prehistoric societies, the claim as it is leveled against Jews, was rarely attested to in antiquity. It was however, frequently attached to early communities of Christians in the Roman Empire, reemerging as a Christian accusation against Jews in the medieval period.^[7][8] This libel—alongside those of well poisoning and host desecration—became a major theme of the persecution of Jews in Europe from that period to the present day.^[4]