because she’s just an employee like any other employee. She wasn’t elected into the position. The terms of the agreement aren’t relevant to anything. She’s accepted the money under the terms of the agreement. The payment seems commensurate with the role and professional damage caused by the news release of her relationship with the minister
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Another reason we need an ICAC
Another reason we need an ICAC, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)