Be nice to get some geos views on this but given the proximity to Paris (not to mention Helen ) and the "near-surface" nature of the find, could we conclude that the resource (once-defined) is an extension of Paris for the purposes of mining and not another standalone discovery?
That is, that the resource could be added to that of Paris? This I think is important from the point of view of infrastructure requirements. For example - assume they find 40m ozs - this would meant Paris has 100m oz of resource and not 60m?
Just a thought guys, that is all.
IVR Price at posting:
5.3¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
) and the "near-surface" nature of the find, could we conclude that the resource (once-defined) is an extension of Paris for the purposes of mining and not another standalone discovery?
(20min delay)