It is incredible what people on these threads will say/believe. I see more comments about apparent "paid downrampers" and fairly little from holders asking why the company promised 1) a DFS for Authier/NAL, and 2) alluded to
"fully fund NAL restart plan". As
@bombersmadd is showing, barely one quarter on and there's a somewhat underwhelming PFS (verses the company MC at least), and no debt funding.
Hold the company to task for what they said they were going to do. Instead of the points made in the January AGM, they're diluting the register to pull funds from shareholders. Honestly, you guys have to take your blinkers off and be willing to seriously consider an alternative view to
"peepz trying to get my sharezzz cheep". Usually in these situations the simple explanation is the correct one: the Korea trip evidently didn't turn out as hoped, otherwise they wouldn't have to go cap in hand to shareholders. It's probably that simple.
I said on these threads a couple of days ago, beware of buying the dip because it could be a negative re-rate (as we've seen on other formerly-popular retail resource stocks). Here you are, from 27c when the PFS was released, to raising even more shareholder cash at 18c. Meanwhile 'Mike' is on Twitter posting rockets and trying to compare SYA's NPV / market cap to PLS, who have two proven projects in production and several others in various stages of design and development. The cognitive dissonance is something to behold!
(20min delay)