Page 4 of the PFS states that the PFS has been completed to an accuracy of +/-30%. The PFS states 163,000t/yr spod will be produced. Adding 30% to 163,000 gets us pretty close to the 220,000t/yr they stated at AGM. Is it possible they have intentionally chosen the lower end of this accuracy range to 'downplay' the resource estimate (to serve current CR purposes) allowing them room to 'grow' the resource when the DFS is released later this year?
Ann: Positive Pre-Feasibility Study Enhances NAL Value, page-583
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.5¢ |
Change
0.004(12.9%) |
Mkt cap ! $360.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.2¢ | 3.7¢ | 3.2¢ | $3.583M | 104.2M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 37 | 5222047 | 3.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6¢ | 3114773 | 17 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |