Share
62,729 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 313
clock Created with Sketch.
06/06/22
16:37
Share
Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag:
↑
ahaaaa..... yes.... Gov should be mandated to consider a 20 year timeframe with any future planning. Why haven't LibNat Govs done this before as Lab Govs have done? is it because they are only capable of considering the immediate goal of the next election? the LibNats have had 9 years to consider nuclear as an option and yet have not done so. Why is this? Have you raised this with either Lib or Nat parties? what was their response? Yet nothing done on the matter. and now we seem to have a planned failure of gas supply which Taylor, who was responsible for designing the energy security arrangements for at least the last 4 years, has at the very least seen developing and done nothing to address the problems of gas supply to the east coast. Why is this? Gillard established many long-term plans for energy supply and climate change/emissions management. the Abbott Gov attempted to destroy everything that Gillard had done (yet whinged about his "legacy" after he was booted soundly from his seat for his failures). so much for LibNat superiority.
Expand
Your herojus t won the election with a record low approval rate. Let's see if he and his Party improve the future by at least having a full analysis of the future nuclear power generation for a Australia, or will he defer that for a term following the next election, like he is trying to do with the ruthlessly destructive live sheep trade from WA?