So outside of administration, they enter into an arrangement to destroy shareholder capital, to transfer percentage interest to private capital providers, is that ethical or is it plain theft. Does it disadvantage some shareholders , even if a majority agreed to it .Does anyone know another company that pursues such stunts ?
News: CLZ Classic Minerals Says It Entered Mandate With Still Capital, page-2
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.017M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| CLZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable