Forgot to mention an important difference is in the deposits: HFR is all Sylvinite, but EML has a large Carnallite component (going from memory). I personally think that EML are going to run into major mining difficulties due to this. Carnallite does not make for a stable mine, and in a lot of cases solution mining would be the preferred way of tapping the resource rather than room and pillar with continuous miners. Not really a problem for Project O, or much of the resource for SHP as there are huge component of sylvinite to go after in the total resource, and probably a reason the Project O was chosen first.
Also EML is not just on AIM but also on the SETSqx section of the exchange, which does is not very liquid and many brokers don't support.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SHP
- Ann: Strong Confirmatory Results from 2nd Ohmgebirge Drillhole
Ann: Strong Confirmatory Results from 2nd Ohmgebirge Drillhole, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SHP (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.010M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | 0.9¢ | $4.32K | 480.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 853440 | 0.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.0¢ | 188146 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
10 | 2229683 | 0.008 |
6 | 1356552 | 0.007 |
1 | 250000 | 0.006 |
2 | 500000 | 0.005 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.010 | 188146 | 2 |
0.011 | 268666 | 3 |
0.015 | 700000 | 1 |
0.020 | 8000 | 1 |
0.027 | 413326 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.57pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SHP (ASX) Chart |