Ann: Wide Interval of IOCG Alteration Confirms Pot. at Mt Lamb NE, page-267

I’d expect ICG to be extra cautious when reporting any serious amounts of mineralisation as Assays will take a while and they’d know the grief ASX will cause. Remember the ruckus when 04 assays came out and the over the top criticism?

As for decision making, there is that bench top XRF at Isa.
Recollection from my chat at RRS, observed geology against geophysics and the geophysics model will drive where follow up holes go this campaign.

I am factoring in min. 4 or so days’ delay in the next report as the whole team was in GC. To me Today would have been the earliest day for reporting on 4 at JS.