Perhaps read the document before commenting on its veracity. The document is 149 pages long, try and make it past page 2.
You present a rather glib dismissal of some rather serious issues. Issues we have been told were beyond reproach, highly scientific and to be believed without question. Issues that were been used to formulate global policy changes. The truth of which was/is sadly not the case.
Despite your assertion, there is enough evidence of impropriety in the emails that there are at least two investigations that I know of currently occurring by the institutions involved.
I also think you will find the reputations of those involved in this train wreck will be recognised for many different things, none of them commendable.
