92E 0.00% 50.0¢ 92 energy limited

Ann: Near Surface Uranium Mineralisation Intersected at GMZ, page-10

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 141 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 16
    I think you're right...Grades in the Athabasca Basin are on a completely different scale compared to say Namibia or Australia. That said, the Rabbit Lake deposit (now mined out) had a resource of 5.84 Mt @0.32% U3O8, and also the JEB deposit (also mined out) was graded at 0.5% U308.

    But from what I can tell, those kinds of grades are outliers in the region – anything <1% seems kinda low (though not necessarily uneconomic) for the Basin. Below graphic (via here) is a bit old, but you get the idea in terms of the grades for the U mines/deposits in the area (the average is ~2%, and some as high as 26.3%...)Via: https://mining.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Athabasca-Sandstone.jpg
    [*For more recent data, see also some of Nexgen's drill results and grades for its Arrow deposit, and Dennison's for Wheeler Hill/Phoenix]

    Anyway, honestly hope I've got this wrong, but just based on the surrounding deposits, the results 92E announced today unfortunately do seem quite low imo
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add 92E (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.