Thanks for taking the time to provide a counter view point.
I greatly appreciate an informed opinion and bear case.
If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying the Australian market isn't big enough to support a listed, stand-alone MGA?
Ensurance won't scale enough to remain viable through the insurance cycle?
Given the Aus business appears to be currently profitable (half year rpt) and scaling up, I was thinking there would be some operating leverage to come through.
Perhaps this is inflated by rates on professional lines being at a temporary high and it doesn't work through the cycle?
I'm aware of the cyclical nature of the industry and commoditised nature of the product.
I would have thought the downside is capped though.
Current enterprise value is ~$13m.
I would have thought the Aus business is worth more than the UK in a trade sale (greater than $8m)?
i.e. even the "sell the last asset, become a cashed shell and look for another deal." scenario wouldn't be a disaster?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ENA
- Ann: ENA signs non-binding agreement to sell its UK operations
Ann: ENA signs non-binding agreement to sell its UK operations, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ENA (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online