Firstly, Mr or Ms Failings should be complimented on the detailed work undertaken. Thank you.
Given a (failed) bid of arguably around $80-85 and in theory a lower price more attractive to a Corporate Buyer of say $70 (+?) why would sellers react in absolute droves in the low $50s when rental income is continuing, the buybacks will increase NTA per share and the managers are doing a good job? What really is in the Dixon advice? What is being told over the phone? Is there a real risk that URF loan interest rates might increase substantially - given latest trends - and impact poorly on NTA?
The next extensive accounts will be useful.
Ann: URF Monthly NAV, Buyback, CPU and US Platform Update, page-33
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add URF (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
32.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(1.54%) |
Mkt cap ! $225.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 32.0¢ | 32.5¢ | 31.5¢ | $277.5K | 867.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47735 | 32.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 32.5¢ | 311759 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| URF (ASX) Chart |