Games are the most interesting to watch when the rules require mastery of a persons skills.
Example : mens netball, is that even a thing? No one would watch it. The game itself really doesn't lend itself to brute strength or aggression being a winning strategy.
Tennis is a great example as above because the game itself allows a great deal of different strategies. Men AND women can both play the game to their strengths and it can still be interesting to watch.
And yet we see in games an allegory to our political life.
Men and women have different strengths, ie, we should act as a team.
However that looks for the individual doesn't matter. What matters is the success of the team!
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Will matriarchy replace patriarchy?
Will matriarchy replace patriarchy?, page-171
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 115 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)