Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Will matriarchy replace patriarchy?, page-221

First 221 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
BenGrahamReborn

13,177 Posts.

21

17/08/22

14:30

Post #: 63167921
Share

Originally posted by Parsifal: ↑

no I’m not contradicting myself at all. My point has been consistent - that attitudes towards women have little to do with competence of capability and a lot to do with other factors. Height, how intellectually threatening they are, views about their roles.

Theses are all biases. The real skill is to be able to recognise when we are falling back to these biases and to learn to collect data to get the best person, pay for performance etc. yes biases are “natural” but that doesn’t make them right or useful. They are simply a neurobiological method of avoiding cognitive overload.

Expand

so on that basis will you admit you too have biases? If so, I am happy to unpack some......
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: Tariff fatigue truly evident; RBA eftpos proposal sinks Tyro

WIN

'Incorrect datasets': Old irony sets WIN Metals up for golden opportunity at Emjay

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Sayona intercepts, Bowen Coking crisis | July 15

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

First 221 Last

SPONSORED BY