I've taken a quick look at the GAL Callistro Ni, Cu and PGE laboratory assays and done some simple plots for Ni vs PGE and Cu vs PGE. As expected, there's a good correlation between Cu% vs PGE's (R2 = 0.89) and Ni% vs PGE's (R2 = 0.87). I think GAL recorded weakly disseminated and disseminated sulphides. Since CNJ-GSR's MTJV001 drill hole recorded visual observations of disseminated and heavily disseminated sulphides we may have PGE's in the 1.5 - 3g/t range or perhaps higher.
Thoughts? Errors?
GAL lab. assay data used in the cross plots.
Kind regards OldGeo