(That grant is looking a little less solid)
Former prime minister Scott Morrison had final say over $828 million in grants in the industry portfolio in the year before the federal election at the same time he held secret authority over five ministries.The spending rules for the Modern Manufacturing Initiative scheme gave Morrison the ultimate power over every grant so he could assert his authority over then-industry minister Christian Porter and his successor Angus Taylor, according to a federal review launched in June to check hundreds of funding decisions.
Scott Morrison announced 12 grants with his colleagues between March 1 and April 4, before the election was called, followed by another five during the campaign. CREDIT:DOMINIC LORRIMER
The new findings reveal the full scale of the former prime minister’s power over the spending program while companies were left waiting for mont up hs to discover if they would receive any grants, fuelling suspicions among applicants that approvals were timed for political gain during the election campaign.
Manufacturing companies have told The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald they were turned away by the previous government or forced to wait because decisions were delayed ahead of the federal election.
The review by officials in the Department of Industry, Science and Resources concluded that the 17 grants were worth $828 million across sectors ranging from food to medicine and defence manufacturing.
RELATED ARTICLE
It also found the former prime minister announced the grants with his colleagues in a spate of 12 decisions that began on March 1 and concluded on April 4 before the election was called, followed by another five spending announcements during the campaign to decide the election on May 21.
Industry Minister Ed Husic, who is considering the new report from his department, questioned why the announcements were made so close to election day and why the prime minister would control the grants.
“It is astonishing the former prime minister took on a role normally reserved for the responsible minister,” he said.
“Given what we now know, it shouldn’t come as a surprise, but it frankly beggars belief.”
The guidelines for the program told applicants a committee would consider their applications but the final decisions would be made by the prime minister. No other federal funding guidelines appear to have the same structure.
“The committee provides advice on the merits of each application. Advice from Industry Innovation Science Australia and relevant ministers will be provided to the minister for industry, science and technology for consideration,” the department said in the guidelines.
“The prime minister will be the final decision maker. The prime minister decides which applications are successful.”
Morrison made the decisions solely as prime minister, not through one of his secret portfolio authorisations, even though industry was one of the ministries he gained in decisions he recommended to Governor-General David Hurley.
The former prime minister said in a statement on Wednesday that he made only one decision with the additional authority he held over the five portfolios – his move in February to cancel an oil exploration licence known as PEP-11 against the wishes of then-resources minister Keith Pitt.
The review of the industry scheme does not contradict his assertion because the guidelines for the $828 million said the final decision would be taken by the prime minister.
The decision to give the then-prime minister ultimate control was a departure from the convention of leaving individual grants to each minister, the system applied in the “sports rorts” affair when then-sports minister Bridget McKenzie held authority to bestow $100 million to clubs and associations but her staff liaised with Morrison’s office before final decisions.
A spokesman for Morrison defended the program on Friday as a significant policy from the 2020 budget to invest in local manufacturing and needing the prime minister’s oversight because it covered many different industry sectors.
RELATED ARTICLE
“The program involved significant grants of on average about $40 million to companies involved in projects that impacted on many different portfolio areas,” the spokesman said.
“The program was designed before the former prime minister was sworn to administer matters in that department, for other reasons that have been set out in the former prime minister’s statement this week, and the two issues are entirely unrelated. The decisions did not require the prime minister to be sworn to that department.
“The process of assessing and awarding the grants included an industry assessment panel, consultation with Industry Innovation and Science Australia and relevant portfolios, which led to the minister for industry making a series of recommendations to the prime minister for approval. Those recommendations were approved without any amendment.”
Asked why the announcements were made in the weeks before the election, the spokesman said the decisions required exhaustive consultation.
EDITOR'S PICK
The departmental review of the industry grants was launched in June and reported by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age at the time but has taken several months to go through hundreds of applications under the initiative, which the previous government set up in 2020 with the promise it would build local industry.
Husic asked for the review out of concern at the scandals over previous Coalition programs including the $100 million “sports rorts” program and the $660 million pledged for commuter car parks, both strongly criticised by the auditor-general.
The initiative, set up in October 2020, offered $1.3 billion in grants in three streams, known as translation, collaboration and integration.
Unlike other parts of the policy, the collaboration stream included rules that left the ultimate decisions to Morrison rather than leaving the decisions to the industry minister at the time, Porter, or his successor in the post, Taylor.
With local jobs a key issue at the election, Husic said in March the Liberals had deliberately delayed the spending programs to “manufacture an election win” by offering money in key sectors.
Husic had also written to Morrison in July 2021 to ask him to accept the advice of the Industry department when making the final decisions.
Industry news site InnovationAus reported the flurry of grants in the collaboration stream over 25 days in March but there was uncertainty about the value of the spending because of the rush of announcements. The reports initially suggested it was $748 million but revised this to $601 million, highlighting the difficulty of tracking the spending.