General Neometals related news, page-2195

yep main differences i see are this slide below. there are extracting a lithium hydroxide, rather than a lithium carbonate.

But also the ReclcLico process only uses the Cathode for recycling and doesn't include the anode. This would lead to the higher 100% recycle rate.

It would seem potentially could be benefits of having hydroxide as this is a direct battery input and this is potentially the main focus and difference of the process employed here. As you noted in post above we have a lithium sulfate produced Li2SO4 which differs from the lithium carbonate shown below. I would be curios to know if its difficult to convert Lithium sulfate to Hydroxide. If it is easy, it would seem NMT technology has some advantages here.