ipcc con job?, page-3

I probably should have mentioned that of the two errors of substance in the multi-volume thousand plus page report that santaclaws refers to, one can properly be attributed to the inter-governmental panel, the other is more accurately attributed to the Netherlands government who provided the data on request and then amended it. Neither error affects the science or findings of the report.

There are apparently a couple of other minor mistakes in the 18,000 or so references listed, but they don't change what's in the report, just the reference itself. (see above)