Hi butcherboy,
I'm not a scientist, just making the point that every error found so far appears to be over the top.
There appears to be a strong bias running through the reports.
I'm used to scientists being very sceptical, and poo-poohing just about everything unless there is hard, verifiable evidence.
That doesn't appear to be the case, for me, about AGW.
But I also know, and will admit, that I must have a Confirmation Bias about this subject, as I just don't believe the claims being made, at the moment anyway.
I wonder if anyone who DOES believe the matter is settled can be honest enough with themselves to think about whether they also may have a similar bias to their own opinions.
- Forums
- General
- ipcc con job?
ipcc con job?, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)