And since then Dan is on 1.4m per year, and we still dont know why Jim left?
Or is that a contradictory statement, because Jim demonstrated multiple times that the land came first, shareholders second, and the BOD were looked after with what was left.
Are we now being told, without beig told, why Jim was pushed?
I hope Dan does not think he can push Dargues aside into a dark closet and hope we all forget about it like he did with Jim. Some of us have not forgotten. The massive red negative return reminds me every single day.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $338.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.0¢ | 21.0¢ | 19.5¢ | $1.314M | 6.477M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 1142551 | 20.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.5¢ | 383861 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 24/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AMI (ASX) Chart |