Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

SGQ

Click for more information

2.94%

3.3¢ st george mining limited

Ann: Significant Lithium Potential at Mt Alexander, page-62

First 62 Last

Son of Gwalia

786 Posts.

471

08/09/22

21:47

Post #: 63600443

Originally posted by coto: ↑
Yes, we have lost a lot of solid contributors over the past 18 months in here. It is a shame, but who can blame them, most of the thread is now trying to navigate through disgruntled ex holders who obviously sold at a loss and now hold a grudge. Many seem to repeat the same lines on the back of every announcement like "great for kitchen benchtops", "good granite resource" etc. It is definitely very old now!

Why they continue this is beyond me? Maybe they are angry they lost a lot of cash and can't cope with a situation where existing holders or new holders may enjoy profits at stages along the journey. We are an exploration company so of course there will be plenty more occasions where we rally on the back of exploration news. Today was no different and I am sure some even made a tidy profit of 20-30% today with the Lithium potential news.

We have 4 projects now actively in the spotlight. Mt Alexander with Ni-Cu-PGE and now Li and rare earth's potential. Patersons Cu-Au project with assays returned in approximately a month now. Plus the Ajana and Broadview projects with maiden drill programs planned for Q4 this year. Plus further drilling of these updated targets at Mt Alexander in Q3. Plenty going on and a lot of newsflow to come about to round out the year. $4.1M still in the kitty as of the end of June. 1 - 2 Quarters of funding remaining, we will need a CR by the end of the year IMO but if good results continue to be returned, no reason why we can't raise above the 7c mark later this year (depending on the quality of results) and then really ramp up exploration in hopefully some better market conditions.

IMO those that really wanted out and sold out at the lows would have done so by now. The main reason for the share price dropping so much has been low volume selling enabling the price to trickle down. As soon as some good news comes, and volume increases, it is very easy to quickly climb back up. With some good assay results from Patersons, we could easily work our way back to 7c IMO. This would de-risk the company significantly, with one of our main projects showing resource potential.

As with today's Li results, early days so I won't get too carried away. However, these 3 main readings below show there is plenty of potential in the area and the next task is to now explore each general area for more Li-bearing pegmatites. The frustrating thing is more assay wait times because XRF hand readings can only pick up pathfinder minerals and not the Li directly. If today's results were isolated and we didn't have the historical and greater knowledge of other public companies you would definitely be holding back on celebrating too early. However, considering that RDT have now proven a Li resource nearby, we have plenty of potential and should be optimistic. I will explain below
- Li2O 228 or 2.28% & Rb 1260ppm
- Li2O 206 or 2.06% & Rb 1140ppm
- Li2O 338 or 3.38% & Rb 43ppm

Initial RDT Announcement 28/09/21 below in relation to the Mt Ida project which enabled their share price move from 17c to 77c. At the top, you can see the pegmatite outcrop with similar percentages to ours. This initial outcrop result is a similar stage to what we are up to... (you have to start somewhere!) Then with historical information they were able to interpret the Pegmatite below the ground per the image.

During the past year with a combination of their own drilling and assaying of old historical drill core (cheaper than drilling their own), RDT were able to progress to the below resource and define the Pegmatite (Announcement 13/05/22). Now there are some decent thick intersections below so there's no wonder why their share price has held up relatively well during this poor time in the market. Plus it is still open! However, they are quite deep which will make it costly to get to.

• IDRCD171 intersected 34.17m @ 1.32% Li2O from 332m including 12.43m @ 2.13% Li2O from 334.5m
• IDRCD104, intersected 19.86m @ 1.77% Li2O from 285.4m including 14.84m 2.06% Li2O from 300.43m
• IDRCD173 intersected 13.49m @ 1.69% Li2O from 251m including 6.85m @ 2.21 Li2O from 257.74m

In relation to SGQ, today's announcement stated that they are currently now undertaking "Systematic rock chip sampling and field mapping of pegmatites is underway at Mt Alexander to finalise targets for drilling in Q4 2022"

Now if management were clever, they would be going over the 'Geoview' open public database/GIS mapping and looking at all historical drilling and if any core is currently stored in the state core library. Splitting up that core into the pegmatite zones and testing for Li and every other relevant mineral! They can undertake the exact same process as RDT did and get an interpreted pegmatite trend going. IMO I would be doing this first and getting assays back in around 2 months and hoping the market bounces hard before any future CR. Especially if the Patersons Cu-Au assays do not meet expectations.

Incredible potential here imo!
Also - Any non-holders or disgruntled holders still complaining, moving forward I will now put you on ignore unless of course, you can add some relevant information like above. But I highly doubt you are capable of spending any time on investigating things (probably just repeat the same old lines). With all the different chances and projects at play I am definitely sticking around for the long haul. Good luck everyone else.
Expand
I can't believe you're trying to give out exploration advice when so much of your post regarding lithium is wrong.

"As with today's Li results, early days so I won't get too carried away. However, these 3 main readings below show there is plenty of potential in the area and the next task is to now explore each general area for more Li-bearing pegmatites."
There were 45 rock chip samples, as seen in the table below, and their average Li2O % was 0.0033%. These results are bad, and both the company and you are trying to spin this to deceive other shareholders.

"The frustrating thing is more assay wait times because XRF hand readings can only pick up pathfinder minerals and not the Li directly."
This is correct, pXRF can't detect lithium, however a LIBS handheld detector can. And the LIBS detector would likely pick all these samples as below detectable levels.

"However, considering that RDT have now proven a Li resource nearby, we have plenty of potential and should be optimistic. I will explain below"
- Li2O 228 or 2.28% & Rb 1260ppm
- Li2O 206 or 2.06% & Rb 1140ppm
- Li2O 338 or 3.38% & Rb 43ppm"
So why are you trying to lie to all the other posters here about incorrect numbers? You don't even understand the difference between ppm and %. This is basic geochemistry in exploration. Rubidium in lithium exploration is bad - its called an LCT pegmatite, not an LCTR pegmatite. If you have rubidium, you've more than likely got lepidolite, zinnwaldite or polylithionite, and not spodumene.
Sample ID Li2O ppm Cs_ppm Ta_ppm Rb_ppm Li2O % Cs % Ta % Rb %
1 MARK047 228 6.7 20.5 1260 0.0228% 0.0007% 0.0021% 0.1260%
2 MARK049 46 4.2 32 363 0.0046% 0.0004% 0.0032% 0.0363%
3 MARK050 206 5.9 13.3 1140 0.0206% 0.0006% 0.0013% 0.1140%
4 MARK061 31 0.3 -0.1 2.2 0.0031% 0.0000% 0.0000% 0.0002%
5 MARK062 26 1.4 42.7 101 0.0026% 0.0001% 0.0043% 0.0101%
6 MARK063 87 7.5 4.8 1580 0.0087% 0.0008% 0.0005% 0.1580%
7 MARK064 24 1.2 125 111 0.0024% 0.0001% 0.0125% 0.0111%
8 MARK065 15 9.5 51.4 1290 0.0015% 0.0010% 0.0051% 0.1290%
9 MARK066 3 4.8 8.8 909 0.0003% 0.0005% 0.0009% 0.0909%
10 MARK067 4 43.7 4.4 6030 0.0004% 0.0044% 0.0004% 0.6030%
11 MARK074 11 3.3 0.7 212 0.0011% 0.0003% 0.0001% 0.0212%
12 MARK075 6 3.3 4.5 353 0.0006% 0.0003% 0.0005% 0.0353%
13 MARK076 4 3.1 5.7 298 0.0004% 0.0003% 0.0006% 0.0298%
14 MARK077 15 1.6 1.5 175 0.0015% 0.0002% 0.0002% 0.0175%
15 MARK079 18 4.2 1.4 344 0.0018% 0.0004% 0.0001% 0.0344%
16 MARK081 4 2 6.8 211 0.0004% 0.0002% 0.0007% 0.0211%
17 MARK082 3 4.7 2.4 479 0.0003% 0.0005% 0.0002% 0.0479%
18 MARK084 72 5.3 1.6 368 0.0072% 0.0005% 0.0002% 0.0368%
19 MARK089 5 1.5 5 409 0.0005% 0.0002% 0.0005% 0.0409%
20 MARK090 6 3.3 1.1 535 0.0006% 0.0003% 0.0001% 0.0535%
21 MARK091 12 9.5 3.1 916 0.0012% 0.0010% 0.0003% 0.0916%
22 MARK092 10 5.4 2.3 517 0.0010% 0.0005% 0.0002% 0.0517%
23 MARK093 17 8.3 4.4 713 0.0017% 0.0008% 0.0004% 0.0713%
24 MARK094 4 4.5 9.7 479 0.0004% 0.0005% 0.0010% 0.0479%
25 MARK095 9 0.5 12.6 54 0.0009% 0.0001% 0.0013% 0.0054%
26 MARK096 5 4.5 8.5 545 0.0005% 0.0005% 0.0009% 0.0545%
27 MARK096 10 4.5 8.3 537 0.0010% 0.0005% 0.0008% 0.0537%
28 MARK097 3 6.7 5.7 753 0.0003% 0.0007% 0.0006% 0.0753%
29 MARK098 3 6.5 3.9 793 0.0003% 0.0007% 0.0004% 0.0793%
30 MARK099 6 10.8 1 1100 0.0006% 0.0011% 0.0001% 0.1100%
31 MARK100 19 0.3 30.4 11.8 0.0019% 0.0000% 0.0030% 0.0012%
32 MARK101 45 4.5 93.8 638 0.0045% 0.0005% 0.0094% 0.0638%
33 MARK102 95 3.9 62.3 455 0.0095% 0.0004% 0.0062% 0.0455%
34 MARK103 338 1.3 86.9 42.8 0.0338% 0.0001% 0.0087% 0.0043%
35 MARK104 31 0.7 46.4 48.4 0.0031% 0.0001% 0.0046% 0.0048%
36 MARK105 3 0.9 72.6 61.6 0.0003% 0.0001% 0.0073% 0.0062%
37 MARK121 2 4.5 6.3 651 0.0002% 0.0005% 0.0006% 0.0651%
38 MARK122 1 0.7 8.2 103 0.0001% 0.0001% 0.0008% 0.0103%
39 MARK123 4 4.4 0.3 609 0.0004% 0.0004% 0.0000% 0.0609%
40 MARK124 15 3.4 4.1 361 0.0015% 0.0003% 0.0004% 0.0361%
41 MARK125 4 3.3 2.1 554 0.0004% 0.0003% 0.0002% 0.0554%
42 MARK126 2 5.6 4.4 556 0.0002% 0.0006% 0.0004% 0.0556%
43 MARK128 13 7 0.7 1420 0.0013% 0.0007% 0.0001% 0.1420%
44 MARK129 6 3.6 9.7 645 0.0006% 0.0004% 0.0010% 0.0645%
45 MARK130 8 4.5 8.4 547 0.0008% 0.0005% 0.0008% 0.0547%
46

AVERAGE 0.0033% 0.0005% 0.0018% 0.0651%

But go on, put the people who are posting correct information on ignore and keep feeding that echo chamber of yours.

SGQ Price at posting: 3.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held

0 Great analysis

Top Stories

RXL

Diamond drilling hits gold at 16.71 g/t for Rox at Paddy's Lode, extending mineralisation

RCE

Recce eyes Indonesia for novel anti-infective as Indo-Aus ties grow stronger

NTI

Neurotech knocked back by FDA as agency declares target condition not rare enough for special status

ACW

Actinogen Medical ramps up Alzheimer’s treatment trials, targeting fast-track global approvals

COD

Coda Minerals (ASX:COD) enters rights issue to further exploration in South Australia

There are more pages in this discussion • 56 more messages in this thread...

First 62 Last

Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist

(20min delay)
Last 3.3¢		Change -0.001(2.94%)		Mkt cap ! $35.92M

Open	High	Low	Value	Volume
3.3¢	3.3¢	3.3¢	$43.71K	1.324M

Buyers (Bids)

No.	Vol.	Price($)
10	3117370	3.2¢

Sellers (Offers)

Price($)	Vol.	No.
3.3¢	516848	4

View Market Depth

No.	Vol.	Price($)
10	3117370	0.032
3	2811111	0.031
14	1432664	0.030
6	2474826	0.029
7	3115246	0.028

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.033	516848	4
0.034	241927	1
0.035	924370	4
0.036	1465351	4
0.037	1467297	4

Last trade - 10.38am 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay)

SGQ (ASX) Chart