IMO:
To clarify, an estimated $2.7M for GV versus what CLZ would benefit would not make this funding arrangement tenable.
There's a high risk in: gold price, factors in production, logistics, resource quality and quality ( inferred only ) and especially in management skills ( lack of for CLZ in producing ).
Margin (net profit) based on averaged sample of nine existing gold mining companies.
Can anyone come up with credible figures that will convince otherwise?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CLZ
- Goldvalley Brown Stone and KAT GAP Terms Analysis
Goldvalley Brown Stone and KAT GAP Terms Analysis, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 61 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CLZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.544M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CLZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable