sky interview friendly wager, page-10

Hi Dave,

I think you have over reacted and misconstrued my comments. I wasn't sniping I was just raising the point that the interview could have been paid for by Intec. I didn't realise a non-holder could post a message on INL's website so that is why I asked via this forum.

Getting the message out is not necessarily a bad thing paid for or not as long as the expense (if paid for) can be justified by attracting some significant long term or even a cornerstone investor.

This is a forum for open discussions on companies, their prospects , management and the decisions/strategies they take. There may be someone on this forum that would like to discuss the pros and cons of potentially spending limited cash reserves on media publicity? who knows unless you ask? who knows a Chinese magnate may have seen the interview and is buying up as we speak?

I also have limited cash reserves so unfortunately I hit my stop loss a while back and had to sell my holding in order to withstand the La Jolla sell off. I do hope to re-enter as a shareholder once the La Jolla sell off/dilution ends and management hopefully take INL to a cash flow point where it is self sufficient and it future secured.

Hope this clears up the misunderstanding.

Cheer

Stu