sky interview friendly wager, page-14

Dear Stuverine,

Thank you for your more considered response, and I will always happily engage with anyone (shareholder or not) in any reasonable discussion, happy also to set aside any negativity associated with previous exchanges.

I think you would be willing to accept that, however you might have intended your post, the wording was sufficiently 'careless' as to allow for the given interpretation, particularly in the context of numerous previous posts of similar tone or approach.

There is a significant difference between healthy public debate, conducted reasonably and professionally, and the approach adopted by some posters to this web site who seek to deliberately create unrest, for reasons known only to themselves. The only thing that can be certain of those reasons is that they are not in the best interests of the majority of Intec's shareholders.

For the record, Intec's Investor Q&A Forum is available to anyone who wishes to ask a question, regardless of their shareholding status. The only criteria is that the correspondent be willing to privately provide their contact details so that we know who we are dealing with.

Once again, Stuverine, I strongly encourage you to ask your question of Intec's Forum. I cannot and will not answer it here, where the answer cannot be shared among the full spectrum of Intec's shareholders, but I can assure you that I would very much like to answer the question publicly.

If you are not willing to ask the question, I would have to wonder why.

Yours sincerely,

Dave Sammut
Corporate Development Manager
Intec Ltd

P.S. As I am taking the rare opportunity to communicate on this web site, I would like to thank the many investors who communicate so positively with the company and particularly with me. As many of you know, I do not welcome a one-eyed 'cheer squad', which I believe creates as many problems as it solves, and I welcome constructive criticism. Neither I nor my colleagues are perfect and we do make mistakes, but we offer our very best efforts and our rigid honesty. For many of us, the success of our careers and our potential personal fortune depend on the success of our efforts here at Intec.

I welcome debate, and I welcome constructive criticism. Most of all, I welcome the opportunity to clarify and address any question that is considered 'unresolved' among the investor community. Now, and a thousand times, I repeat: If you actually want to know the truth of an issue rather than just engage in pointless conjecture, then ask me privately or on Intec's Forum. I will do my very best to answer.