investing in a retro court case, assuming a win, will only ever be worth 1x cash of that win. It will likely be appealed and go to the high court. It won’t finish inside 5 years and will tie up key executives and capital
investing in our strategy and growth will be worth several multiples of the cash generated by that strategy. It will appeal to investors.
So
A) negative rear view with 1 x upside (the
@ChillingOut way)
or
b) positive forward view with many x times upside (the shareholders way)
only a fool or his lawyer would opt for the former
