Meeting Timeframes and Holding Management Accountable, page-63

C'mon Fitzi,

That's not being fair on PB and co. We know they have been distracted by the "unwarranted attack of a minority of shareholders" (could hardly call it unwarranted attack now when it gained just under the necessary 50% vote), and we also know how PB blamed the previous 249D on slowing progress (if only that slowing stopped at the end of the last 249D!!). We also know how many resources, both internal and external of TNG, were focussed on the smear campaign against the CMT trying to ensure PB kept his job. Surely you couldn't expect the MD to allow the company to have it's employees and endless consultants pursue these other company making milestones in a business as usual fashion, at a time when PB was at risk of losing his gig?

On a more serious note, it will defintiely be interesting to hear from them this week. Surely, if not the 3Y's that I was eluding to yesterday, then surely they must come out with some form of announcement, updated timelines, roadmap ahead, details on how PB's new $325k lithium project is going to solve the disconnect between market cap and NPV as he told us via his most recent Small Caps interview with Kerrie?