why is the onus on the invaded country to stop it , particularly when they're winning, and not on the invader ?
You can't pull out the "humanitarian card" when you're losing OR the "nuclear threat card " either .
In the final anaysis the latter won't win for Ulraine and the bluff must be called or putin will repeat it .
the problem is putin ... his dreams of russian empire ... as he has admitted ... but russia clearly a second rate power now and apart form the ethics they just aren't capable of it .
and if their nukes are as badly maintained as their army has been .... who knows where they'll go or when they'll explode ?
- Forums
- World Politics
- explosion on kerch bridge
explosion on kerch bridge, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
NEU
Neuren Pharmaceuticals dips after pediatric Angelman Syndrome Phase 2 trial results fail to impress
NEWS
Is oil undervalued?
NEWS
Week 31 Wrap: JORC rules to get tougher; RBA rate hike chance 50/50; US Fed Sept cut still the quo