Again, how can the ASX left such a vague announcement stand without requesting clarification. Surely you cannot announce an average head grade without stating the weight of the initial material put through? It could have been a small, hand selected portion of material . There is no detail on control samples, sample weights, sample selection procedures. nothing to prove this is not just a cherry picked sample.
IMO ASX needs to ask for more detail and substantiation
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CLZ
- Ann: 6.06 g/t Au AVERAGED IN FIRST BULK SAMPLE ORE THROUGH GEKKO
Ann: 6.06 g/t Au AVERAGED IN FIRST BULK SAMPLE ORE THROUGH GEKKO, page-9
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CLZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.544M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CLZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LGP
LITTLE GREEN PHARMA LTD
Paul Long, Chief Executive Officer
Paul Long
Chief Executive Officer
SPONSORED BY The Market Online