.
@ASXleoIt means exactly what's quoted in the orders:-
"The parties have agreed to compromise the Privilege Challenge List dispute"
All my idea's following, you can decide if it makes sense:-
For any deal to work it's got to be give and take - win - win. What was on the table would impact both parties, ISX for, and that's why they wanted the info, and ASX against, that's why they didn't want it to be known, and used LPP to effect this.
So all things considered, Isx would have got what they needed out of the deal for there best interests in moving forward.
And asx the same deal, the would have limited the info that could be shared / used in the trial against them.
Now we'll just have to wait for further developments to unfold.
IMO, ISX are in the box seat here, there attacking and making gains were ASX are on the defence going backwards trying to limit losses. It was the same with VISA LPP a few weeks ago.
By cutting a deal deal at least the asx / visa control what is shared. Instead of all the info before the courts.
Like any game, the idea's to get yourself into a winning position at full time, and this is another points on the board win for isx imo in the litigation game.
Cheers
Tradealot
.